[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: xsp2:ID and comp:ID
Kohsuke, See my notes below. Thanks, DW. Message text written by Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI > I think it boils down to one question: do you want to define your own datatype with ID semantics? If no, then there is no problem. RELAX NG lets you define whatever datatype library as long as (1) it returns simple yes/no and (2) it has no other sideeffect whatsoever. >>>>>>> I think the Yes/No is what I'm after. If yes, then I understand that you think it is a problem. But considering our position that this ID functionality is just for compatibility only, I guess we should wait for the more comprehensive spec that covers the cross-reference problem. >>>>>>> Compatibility is definately the goal. The most obvious example is a COBOL copybook with a picture mask in it something like "$Z99999.V99" for a Decimal type. If I have a Cobol-compatibility library it becomes a snap to convert these copybooks to RELAX structures and just drop in those masks as is. DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC