[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: externalRef versus include
> Maybe the tutorial needs to say something about <externalRef> versus > <include>, or at least this topic should be covered in the FAQ. It sounds like a nice topic to cover in our FAQ. Or maybe we can have a document that describes various techniques and discuss the use cases of <externalRef> and <include> there. > Am I right in assuming that the only circumstance where you would *have* > to use <include> instead of <externalRef> is when you want to combine > definitions from multiple grammars (using the "combine" attribute)? I think <include> is also useful when * modularizing a schema into many small pieces (like XHTML m12n.) * you want to use multiple declarations in the included file and you don't need to worry about the name collision. regards, -- Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI +1 650 786 0721 Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC