[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: more: RELAX NG FAQ
David RR Webber - XMLGlobal wrote: > Message text written by Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI > >>- Why do I need RELAX NG, when W3C XML Schema is there? >> > < > > I love this one! Yes... For me, one of the drawbacks of W3C XML Schema that should be highlighted is its inability to represent some XML constructs that cannot be considered as "bad pratices". This can be read between the lines when you say: > By limiting the scope to structure definitions, RELAX avoids > the drawbacks of W3C Schema, giving a much more > elegant and predictable toolset. Some examples might be given such as the definition of elements in which the order of sub elements doesn't matter or the definition of vocabularies where an element (same name, same location) can take several types and content models. My 0,02 Euros. Eric -- See you in Scottsdale, Arizona. http://xmlconnections.com/xml/xmlfall2001/speakers.asp#evandervlist ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC