[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Associating schema with document
James Clark wrote: > The point is compatibility with XML applications rather than XML processors. > In the Java world, many XML applications allow you to plug in any XML > processor that implements an appropriate interface. If there was a way for > associate a RELAX NG schema with an instance, then a RELAX NG processor > sitting on top of a non-validating XML processor could masquerade as a > validating XML processor. This would allow XML applications (eg XSLT > processors) implemented in Java to use RELAX NG as a subsitute for a DTD. I now understand your scenario, and it makes sense. However, if I care compatibility, I still prefer to embed internal DTD subsets rather than a PI or attribute. Does use of PIs or attributes have any advantages over use of internal subsets? Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC