Re: [relax-ng] RE: [xml-dev] Schematron/Schema market share

[Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>]

Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net> writes:

> Is Len Bullard's assertion true about ISO and RELAX NG?
> 
> -Mike

Rick Jelliffe posted a note about this standards effort -- Document
Schema Definition Language (DSDL) -- to his Schematron mailing list a
few weeks back:

  http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/6317/2001/12/0/7332789/

and another one a little more recently:

  http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/6317/2002/1/0/7561555/

And Robin Cover has a page for tracking DSDL activity:

  http://xml.coverpages.org/dsdl.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: 'Doug Ransom'; Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Schematron/Schema market share
> 
> 
> I don't know how far along anyone is, but a combination of the Schematron
> approach
> and the Schema approach as has been demonstrated by Rick Jeliffe looked very
> powerful.  Also, I think there was an announcement that Clark, Jeliffe,
> Holman et al
> were initiating ISO work to create a combined specification using RelaxNG.
> Please any of the above
> correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> [truncated]
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

-- 
Michael Smith, Tokyo, Japan    http://sideshowbarker.net
&#x30DE;&#x30A4;&#x30AF;

All true language is incomprehensible, like the chattering of a
beggar's teeth.
  
  --Antonin Artaud