[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [relax-ng] Annotations in the non-XML syntax
OK. Unless anybody expresses a preference for a single >, I will change back to >>. --On 19 March 2002 15:34 -0800 Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net> wrote: > James: Just as adjacent patterns or name classes in a group require a > connector > James: (e.g. |), so annotation elements that are siblings of patterns or > name > James: classes require a connector (>) > > John: I think that ">>" should be used instead of ">" (as in the previous > John: representation), because of its greater visibility. > > James: Noted. Anybody else have an opinion? > > > I like the append connotation of '>>'. It fits in my mind with the > connotation of followAnnotations, so it gets my vote. > > Mike > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC