[relax-ng] ooRelaxNG (was: Limitation ...)

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

James Clark scripsit:

> ooRelaxNG isn't RELAX NG.  It is a distinct vocabulary, having a lot of 
> similarity to RELAX NG, which can be easily translated into RELAX NG.  The 
> os:class element is not a RELAX NG annotation, rather it's a first-class 
> member of the ooRelaxNG vocabulary, just like os:element (note that it's 
> os:element not rng:element).  

Ah, I didn't understand this properly from the documentation, though
I suspected it from reading the examples.

Next question: what is the point of making the oi:class attribute
in the instance mandatory?

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_