[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] converting relax ng schema to w3c schema?
> Yes, that's right, WXS is very wrong to mix both aspects. We agree on this. > Who knows which is the best > choice for the author of my original RNG schema? No automatic tool can > be sure to make the right choice and, if it needs to ask the question > for any such choices (this one is only an example), it might become as > difficult and complex for the user to answer those choices than to use > WXS :-( ... I think there is a right choice here, and that is not to try to abuse the global/local element distinction for something for which it was not designed. >> That's not how I interpret the spec. Which schema processors disallow >> this? > > My interpretation is based on a discussion with Henry Thompson: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Nov/0188.html > > And the spec seems rather clear: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#mg-props-correct I don't agree. See the discussion at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200202/msg00935.html Fortunately the major schema processors I've tried all agree with me (XSV, MSV, SQC, MSXML). Are there any that adopt your interpretation? James
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC