[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] Mixed and compact syntax
Eric van der Vlist scripsit: > I find this very confusing for especially for "mixed{foo, bar}". People > would probably expect this to mean "mixed content with ordered foo and > bar" rather than a "group of foo and bar with any text node before or > after the group"! To me, at least, those two expressions (in quotation marks) sound exactly synonymous. Could you attempt to explain what you take the difference to be? > Makes me think that I have a more general question about the rules to > read things such as: "p1, p2 | p3 & p4"... Are these allowed and how do > they read? They are not allowed. BTW, in your RNG book (for which three cheers!) which are you going to present as the primary syntax, compact or XML? -- John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan http://www.reutershealth.com Common Gaelic in Cyrillic script! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC