[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [relax-ng] (Minor) inconstency between XML and compact syntaxes
Not very important, but I have just noticed that... start = foo, bar is allowed while <start> <ref name="foo"/> <ref name="bar"/> </start> is forbidden (the content model of the start element accepts only one pattern). Wouldn't it be less confusing if a simplification rule was added to embed start children element into a group (like it is the case for define elements)? Eric -- Did you know it? Python has now a Relax NG (partial) implementation. http://advogato.org/proj/xvif/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC