Re: [relax-ng] A proposed revision of the OASIS TC Process,

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

/ "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp> was heard to say:
| Option 1: This TC will not accept the new IPR policy and will 
|           dissolve in nine months.
|
| At present, the OASIS RELAX NG specification is available at 
| http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203.htm.
| The other specs of this TC are available in the same directory.
|
| I am not sure if these specs continue to be avaliable when this TC 
| is closed.  If the directory for this TC is removed, will these 
| specs disappear?  Remember that RELAX NG is merely a committee 
| spec rather than an OASIS standard.  (We can certainly go for 
| an OASIS standard, but is this a clever use of our time?  After 
| all, RELAX NG is an ISO/IEC standard already.)

As Karl said, the specs will remain.

| Option 2: Some members of the TC leave, and this TC is rechartered 
|           under the new policies.
|
| If we exercise this option, apparently, none of the RELAX NG 
| specs will disappear.
|
| However, the proposed TC process requires that we add a new 
| deliverable.  Otherwise, this TC will be closed.
|
|> The TC Administrator must close a TC that has completed
|> charter if the TC does not add new deliverables.
|
| What should be the new deliverable?  RELAX NG V2?

Errata are one obvious choice.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

PGP signature