rights message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [rights] Core, Standard Extension,Conformance and Profiles - A non political discussion
- From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- To: 'Krishna Sankar' <ksankar@cisco.com>, rights@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:50:25 -0400
Title: Message
Krishna,
Could
you discuss the distinction between base and standard extensions a little? As we
sort features, I assume we'd want to have some guidelines to help determine
whether something was better off in the former or latter category, and I was
wondering what you had in mind.
Bob DuCharme
Consulting Software Engineer, LexisNexis
Data Architecture, Editorial Systems
and Content Engineering
Hi
all,
Here is my (technical) understanding on the above
topic.
a) The core as it stands now, is a
framework. It consists of many abstract types and relationships between them.
Wouldn't make any sense to make the core mandatory or even a base for
conformance.
b) The standard extensions are a
little more concrete, they add a few more supporting
elements.
c) Which means we need to develop
profiles as basis for implementation and hence conformance.
d) Different profiles could be
disjoint, based on a light-weight hierarchy. i.e. have a base profile (which
everyone should implement) and then different profiles which could build on each
other or stand by themselves.
e) For starters, I see three profiles -
Base Profile, Core Profile (= Base + Core Spec) and a standard extensions
profile (=Base+Core Spec+Std Extensions Spec or Core Profile + Std
Extensions Spec)
f) Now we can discuss conformance. The
conformance would be based on profiles and o the profiles document would say
what conformance means. May be there are levels of conformance for each of the
profiles. Of course, the Base Profile would need to be a binary conformance or
in other words the Base Profile has mandatory full
conformance.
just
some thoughts.
cheers
BTW,
am in Europe doing some EU security work and so missed all the excitement at the
GB meeting.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC