OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

rights message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [rights] TIME OUT, PLEASE


Hari,

>
> Let me try to address some of the points in your note and ask for
> further clarification...
>
> (1) "This proposal is even more puzzling in light of the lively
> discussion at the F2F meeting, which resulted in an amendment to the
> Charter."
>
> What the RLTC voted on was a clarification to the charter and not an
> amendment.
>

Yes, "clarification." The point remains that OASIS TC Guidelines require 
that "the results [of a clarification vote] must be minuted and posted 
to the TC mail list and web page, and communicated to the TC
Administrator who will make an announcement to the members of OASIS."
 (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/guidelines.shtml#clarify_charter)

As far as we can tell, none of these steps have been taken.

> Nothing was "expunged" after the RLTC motion was passed. At the
> meeting, I referred to the fact that
> 1. your requirements submission is still on the document repository
> (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/rights/documents/subcommittee/r
>equirem ents/collected/sltppc/) and
> 2. that all of the previous work in the excel spreadsheet (which I
> will remind to everyone again is just a tool to develop the aggregate
> RLTC Requirements) is still available in the document repository.
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/rights/documents/subcommittee/re
>quireme nts/analysis-wip/
>
> I will again note that when the cross referencing was updated by the
> motion passed by the RLTC General Body that THERE WERE NO CHANGES TO
> THE LIST OF RLTC REQUIREMENTS. All of the RLTC Requirements, the
> wording of which you agreed with as the Requirements SC dispositioned
> your requirements, are still in the RLTC Requirements Document.

While the underlying requirement submissions exist, the cross-references 
to the Samuelson Clinic's requirements were expunged. In other words, 
the Clinic's requirements cannot formally be considered to be part of 
the requirements base from which the higher level requirements -- THE 
RLTC Requirements -- were abstracted.

Aaron Burstein
Dean Rowan
Deirdre Mulligan
----------------------------------------------------------
Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC