Re: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck

["Lipton, Paul C" <Paul.Lipton@ca.com>]

Title: Re: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck

OCCI was only one purpose, IMHO. We need a committee approved general version asap, too.

Thanks,
Paul (from mobile)

----- Original Message -----
From: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com <Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org <saf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tue Mar 16 05:10:15 2010
Subject: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck

Following my last email, we should finalize, motion, and vote on the FAQ on Thursday to accept it as a Committee Draft (Full Majority Vote -i.e. more than 50% of the voting members).

I am not sure if we should do the same with the slidedeck at this point as it is focused on OCCi interactions. If we generalize it for educational purposes then we should vote on it as well.

Thoughts?

Stavros