We can
wait for the first reactions and questions from the OCCi community on Thursday
morning, then incorporate any relevant changes, and discuss on Thursday's call.
Might be tricky to approve a Committee draft on the spot, but we can use the
Working Draft for the time being (?) I think generalizing from the OCCi
slidedeck is not very difficult...
Cheers,
Stavros
+1
On 16 Mar 2010, at 13:31, Lipton, Paul C wrote:
OCCI was only one purpose, IMHO. We need a committee
approved general version asap, too.
Thanks, Paul (from
mobile)
----- Original Message ----- From: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com
<Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com> To:
saf@lists.oasis-open.org
<saf@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent:
Tue Mar 16 05:10:15 2010 Subject: [saf] More on FAQ and
slidedeck
Following my last email, we should finalize, motion, and
vote on the FAQ on Thursday to accept it as a Committee Draft (Full Majority
Vote -i.e. more than 50% of the voting members).
I am not sure if we
should do the same with the slidedeck at this point as it is focused on OCCi
interactions. If we generalize it for educational purposes then we should
vote on it as
well.
Thoughts?
Stavros
Take care:
Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu .
com >
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
Hayes Park Central
Hayes End Road
Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
Reg. No. 4153469
+44-7590-293439 (Mobile)
______________________________________________________________________
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
Registered No. 4153469
This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that
it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.
|
|