Stavros
– Posting the meeting notes now.
Here
is the latest on issues 005/009:
- Use case 1 –
Group symptoms that are hierarchically related (as known by emitter).
- Example: Any
of the standard syndrome examples will work. A top level ‘symptom’
effectively acts as a syndrome. Only difference is that the
relationship (between symptoms) is understood prior to analysis by the
diagnostician.
- Proposal: New
symptom field called ‘Related Symptoms’. Since this is identical to our
existing ‘Probable Cause’ field, but with broader semantic meaning, we
propose to replace ‘Probable Cause’.
- Use case 1.5 –
Complex grouping of symptoms in a relationship (outside of that dictated
by a syndrome)
- Example:
Symptom relationships are defined in a CMDB.
- Proposal:
Diagnostician could/should leverage externally defined relationships. This
is perhaps an implementation detail.
- Use case 2 –
Group Symptoms that are part of the same incident.
- Example: Fever
& Chill symptoms are reported Dec 2010, and again in March 2011.
These represent two separate incidents (and not to be considered
together by the diagnostician).
- Proposal:
IncidentID
- Issues: A
single symptom could be involved in multiple incidents.
- Use case 3 –
Escalating or De-escalating symptoms.
- Example: Fever
symptom gets progressively worse, and then after treatment goes away
entirely.
- Proposal:
Existing attributes (along with proposed IncidentID) could identify this
escalation/de-escalation of effectively the same symptom (albeit
different symptom id). The combination of IncidentID + Symptom Type +
Subject should be enough for the diagnostician to track this
progression.
- Use case 4 –
Status symptoms
- Example:
Temperature symptom is reported every 5 minutes. The last symptom
should supercede all others.
- Proposal: We
haven’t addressed this use case.
I
grouped them into Use cases (although technically that wasn’t part of the
discussion last week).
I
decided not to put this into the Spec (just yet).
From:
Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com [mailto:Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:00 AM
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [saf] Call today
Hi all,
A draft agenda for today's call. I think we should continue
on:
-
Quick discussion on CMWG ballot
-
Technical Issues
o
Any updates/insights on Protocol name
o
Symptom linking/referencing: come to concrete
proposals bringing in ProbableCause from existing spec and latest discussions
o
Syndrome resolution: as above bringing in
IssuedPrescription from the current spec
-
Potential F2F in first quarter 2011?
-
AOB?
Thoughts? Changes? Suggestions?
Thanks and speak to you soon,
Stavros
______________________________________________________________________ Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE Registered No. 4153469 This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free. |