[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Issues to review
Stavros
will send meeting notes, but wanted to explicitly mention a few issues
discussed today, in order for you to provide final thoughts: 1.
SAF-3 – normalized notification mechanism. This issue
tracks back to the very early pre-spec days and suggests a standard format
& transport for symptoms, ie: CBE over WS-Eventing, etc. Since that
time we’ve defined the Symptom type and steered clear of a transport for
the normative spec. Thus, we recommend closing this issue. Any
objections? 2.
SAF-6 – See below. Did not discuss today. 3.
SAF-19 – remove “Issued_Prescription” from
Symptom. Issued_prescription is an audit of prescriptions issued as a
result of this symptom, and thus, can only be supplied (presumably by a case
manager) after emission. In addition, we would need to identify in the
spec the entity which modifies the symptom, along with the interfaces used to
modify it. The audit nature of this field opens a “can of worms”
with little interoperability benefit. For this reason, we recommend removing
from the Spec. Any objections? 4.
SAF-11 – RelatedSymptoms. The latest Spec draft
revision has a recommendation, but we are still struggling with extensibility
of the Relationship type. A few valid proposals are on the table, and
Fujitsu is going to run by their xml schema expert. 5.
SAF-8 – Grouping of AssociatedProtocols. Still
discussing whether the relationship is needed. See today’s meeting
notes and most recent draft Spec revision. From: Vaught, Jeffrey A Please take
a glance at the following issues in Jira: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa
and offer your thoughts. We will
likely vote on some of these next week (3/28), at least those that we recommend
closing (and won’t be represented in the draft Spec). 1. SAF-3 – Normalized
Notification mechanism – We recommend closing. 2. SAF-6 – Signature Composition
– We have agreement on most of this issue, but still considering a way
to reference a triggered Syndrome within another Syndrome signature. See
the issue. 3. SAF-19 – Remove
“Issued_Prescription” from Symptom. Please review
and offer thoughts. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]