See
the 7/25 meeting notes.
We
have a few topics that could use further (email) discussion prior to the next meeting.
Some comments from the meeting are in italics.
Specifically:
- Should the Types
Registry only include SymptomType and PrescriptionType, or also include
SyndromeType & ProtocolType?
- Effectively,
the Catalog “is” the place where SyndromeType &
ProtocolType are defined. Maybe the Catalog could also be the
place where SymptomType & PrescriptionType are defined?
- Should
Symptom/PrescriptionType definitions be optional?
- Without these
definitions it would be difficult to author a Syndrome & Protocol,
but not impossible. One could do manual analysis of the Symptom
Store to understand the content & arguments schema. Ideally
the SymptomEmitter and Practitioner would provide these types, but
(again) not required.
- What does
definition look like?
- SymptomType
- Type
- Content
schema (xml schema)
- PrescriptionType
- Type
- Argument
schema (xml schema)