[saml-dev] Re: SAML Demo

[Don Bowen <don.bowen@sun.com>]

You wouldn't be yielding to me :-) You and Prateek are the experts and
I'm only trying to do what little I can to make this thing a success.

Don;

Hal Lockhart wrote:

 

Prateek,

I apologise if this is my error. I just went back through the saml-dev list and the minutes of all the concalls and I could see no record of a decision on this subject.

It was my understanding from my discussions with Jim Kobielus that I would be "representing" the SAML Interop at the Catalyst Conference and that this included the press conference. I would be glad to yield to you and Don at the press conference if this is the sense of the rest of the participants.

Regards,

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:pmishra@netegrity.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 7:43 PM
> To: 'Hal Lockhart '; ''dee schur' '; 'Don Bowen '
> Cc: Mishra, Prateek; 'Carol Geyer '
> Subject: RE: SAML Demo
>
>
> Hal,
>
> there is some misunderstanding regarding the Monday and Tuesday
> events. My clear recollection was that you were to address
> the Catalyst
> meeting on Tuesday and that Don B. and I (as the main
> demo organizers) were to organize the Monday AM press
> briefing.  I will give you a call tomorrow so we
> can resolve this ASAP.
>
> - prateek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Lockhart
> To: 'dee schur'; Don Bowen
> Cc: pmishra@netegrity.com; Carol Geyer
> Sent: 6/21/02 11:07 AM
> Subject: RE: SAML Demo
>
> Here are some slides she may want to pick and choose from.
>
> As an update, the Demo dry runs went extremely well. We
> planned to work
> all week if necessary, but were finished mid day on Wed. A few SAML
> problems were found and fixed, but most of the difficulties were
> non-SAML, such as incompatabilities in SSL implementations.
> This is very
> impressive for a specification that has never been implemented before.
>
> Hal
>
> P.S. BTW, the OASIS slide format is a major pain!!! The dark
> background
> forced me to go back and hand modify every diagram to change the color
> of lines so they would show up. This is not a task I had planned for
> this week.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dee schur [mailto:dee.schur@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:01 PM
> To: Hal Lockhart; Don Bowen
> Cc: pmishra@netegrity.com; Carol Geyer
> Subject: RE: SAML Demo
>
>
> Hi Hal,
> Anne is doing the Sys-Con Web Services Edge conference next
> week and she
> is going to mention the SAML demo, can you send me a few of the slides
> that you think will work for a brief overview. We might be able to
> squeeze them into a few more presentations in the next few weeks.
> Thanks Hal.
> Dee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: 'dee schur'; Don Bowen
> Cc: pmishra@netegrity.com; Carol Geyer
> Subject: RE: SAML Demo
>
>
> 10 or 15 minutes should be sufficient.
>
> I will only make 2 or 3 points about SAML in general and then focus on
> the demonstration itself and its significance.
>
> Very definitely it will be much less technical than sessions
> targeted to
> the attendees. I am sure that the question the press wants
> answered is:
> what does this mean for the industry?
>
> Hal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dee schur [mailto:dee.schur@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:37 PM
> To: Don Bowen; Hal Lockhart
> Cc: pmishra@netegrity.com; Carol Geyer
> Subject: RE: SAML Demo
>
>
> Hi,
> Carol and I just spoke with Burton's PR firm regarding the press
> conference.  We are trying to firm up the press event.
> Hal, how much time will be needed for the SAML overview for the press?
> you might not want to be quit as technical as you will be at
> the evening
> demo or the presentation the next day during your session.
> We are think ing that we may start in one room (because of the room
> layout) and then move to the California room for the actual demo.
> Thanks for your feedback.
> Dee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Bowen [mailto:don.bowen@sun.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:12 PM
> To: Hal Lockhart
> Cc: 'dee schur'; pmishra@netegrity.com; Carol Geyer
> Subject: Re: SAML Demo
>
>
> We may be able to piggyback on Burton's T1 line and even have
> wireless,
> which they are offering to the conference attendees (very bad
> idea in my
> opinion). I'm talking to Jason and will post to the list when I know
> more. Dee, if you are more up to date, feel free to share.
>
> Don;
>
>
> Hal Lockhart wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I understood I would speak to the press.
>
>
> I am working on the slideas and will have a draft out today.
>
>
> Internet connectivity is not needed for the demo, only for us
> to connect
> back to our companies for support, email, software updates, etc.
>
>
> The demo operates entirely between the SAML-aware systems we are
> providing. Nothing on the Internet speaks SAML. Why would we want to
> communicate with it?
>
>
> Hal
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dee schur [ mailto:dee.schur@oasis-open.org
> <mailto:dee.schur@oasis-open.org> ]
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:32 AM
> > To: don.bowen@sun.com; hal.lockhart@entegrity.com;
> > pmishra@netegrity.com
> > Cc: Carol Geyer
> > Subject: SAML Demo
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > Two things:
> > 1.    Since Hal is speaking on Tuesday, I assumed Prateek
> > will do the press
> > conference overview which Jahan is preparing in ppt?
> > 2.    Kathy Hermann called last night, very concerned that we
> > are opting
> > for no internet connection in the demo room. Can we really
> do the demo
>
> > without connectivity? She said that Burton would pick up the
> > cost for "a
> > few lines if need be."  Should I take her up on it?
> > Thanks,
> > Dee
> >
>
>  <<SAML-demo-extract.ppt>>
>

Attachment: don.bowen.vcf
Description: Card for Don Bowen