[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Date format issue
I do not recall any discussion before or during the dry runs about limiting time values to not use milliseconds. At least it wasn't discussed on the east coast nor on the con-calls. The only thing that I recall we discussed and agreed upon was that everyone must use "Z" format times rather than the +/-hhmm timezone offsets. The specs were a little unclear on this matter but that was apparently what was intended.
However, the specs are quite clear that milliseconds are allowed (but not required) and that nothing finer than milliseconds should be relied upon.
Was there such an "agreement" made just at the west coast dry run?
Rob Philpott RSA Security Inc. The Most Trusted Name in e-Security Tel: 781-515-7115 Mobile: 617-510-0893 Fax: 781-515-7020
-----Original Message-----
We accept UTC dateTime in any format as specified in XML Schema. But we send out dateTime in this format YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ, (as agreed upon at the dry run?)
Mingde Xu CrossLogix Inc
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC