saml-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Introduction & Question about the "heaviness" of S AML

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: ngehani@us.checkpoint.com, 'John Herendeen' <john.herendeen@entegrity.com>,'Adam Theo' <theo@theoretic.com>, 'Mark Wilcox' <mark.wilcox@webct.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:50:11 -0500

>Are the minutes configurable? 

It's more or less unspecified. "Long enough to get it from site A to B,
short enough to limit the danger." A relying site has its own policy on
how long a SSO assertion should be valid.

-- Scott

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [saml-dev] Introduction & Question about the "heaviness" of S AML
  - From: Neil Gehani <ngehani@us.checkpoint.com>

References:
- RE: [saml-dev] Introduction & Question about the "heaviness" of S AML
  - From: Neil Gehani <ngehani@us.checkpoint.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC