Re: [saml-dev] Any work on WSDL for restricted SAML responder?

[Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>]

> That having been said, we would be better served by moving all of the
> protocol pieces to SOAP, IMHO, and going halfway with it is not all that
> useful to me. But I don't see that happening, since it would require SOAP to
> provide things it simply doesn't without inventing headers.

Can you explain this?

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html