[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] SAML 1.1 Technical Overview (11 May 2004)
> There isn't a standard way to do this, so the SPs and IdPs would need to > agree on how to transport it. For example, you could include it in the > first section in the relay state (something that most IdPs would ignore) > or you add another field to the data being sent ot the IdP. There is the option in 2.0 to include a Subject/NameID in the AuthnRequest, but it's not necessarily directly analagous to this use case. > Of course, this depends on you knowing the IdPs that you ware willing > to work with, but I think that's a given anyway since I assume you > don't want to work with the IdP I have running down in my basement:-). I agree with the overall sentiment, but in some of the academic use cases, the number of trusted IdPs is extremely large (i.e. every university). Displaying links just isn't reasonable. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]