[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Which version to use?
I think Liberty would be a great option Scott Wiseman Novell Groupwise Consultant Microsoft Exchange Consultant Great Plains, MAS90, QuickBooks Consultant http://www.avidware.net http://links.avidware.net http://www.intercore.net 888.603.6333 ext 89 -----Original Message----- From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:31 AM To: 'Kapil Sachdeva' Cc: saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Which version to use? > Could you please elaborate what makes Liberty not an option if both > specifications are the same except for schema namespaces ? They're not exactly the same, just functionally equivalent. SAMLv2 is the successor to ID-FF 1.2 in terms of Liberty progression. It has features ID-FF 1.2 doesn't, because it's a merge of existing work into a new spec. > The thing is that I am not able to understand the existence of two > parallel standards and that too when two standard organizations have > 90% common companies formulating the specifications. They're not parallel, SAMLv2 is the standardization via OASIS of the functional work done in ID-FF plus additional issues raised by SAML deployments. One follows from the other. > For me (unless I am very wrong) I see the vendors implementing two > parallel specs i.e. Liberty-ID-FF-1.2 & SAML 2.0. And for sure will > arise an issue of interoperabilty between 2 of them in near future. http://www.people-services.net/ There is no direct wire interoperability, any more than there is between ID-FF 1.1 and 1.2, or SAML 1.1 and SAMLv2. Interop is a product-level issue. I'm sure many vendors will implement both, but that's their business. The direction of evolution is still one-way, at least in the SAML community. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]