[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Which version to use?
Just to emphasize Irving's point. The Liberty Alliance states no more work will be done on ID-FF because it has been turned over to OASIS. I don't mean this in a derogatory way, but ID-FF is effectively a "dead end". Yes it works, yes it was quality work, yes it benefited the industry, but I personally don't see why a new project would consider using ID-FF over SAMLv2 (unless you are deploying NOW and need concrete stable standards NOW). The future along this path is SAMLv2. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Irving [mailto:irving.reid@hp.com] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:09 PM To: Kapil Sachdeva; Scott Cantor Cc: saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Which version to use? > From: Kapil Sachdeva [mailto:ksachdeva@sbcglobal.net] ... > Scott, I am also sure vendors will implement both as they will be left > with no other choice like having a merge of SAML & Liberty standard > into one. SAMLv2 *is* the merge of SAML and Liberty ID-FF standards into one. That is why Liberty contributed their ID-FF work to OASIS; both organizations agreed that it would be best to move to a single standard, managed by an acknowledged public standards body. - irving -
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]