[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] strongly matches
> In the definition of "strongly matches" in section 3.3.4 of SAML2Core, > is it implied that the SubjectConfirmation/@Method attributes of the > two Subjects are equal? @Method more or less yes, along with the other simple content, but the actual confirmation data, nope. Quite by design, e.g. "HoK using KeyName Foo" -> "HoK using X509Certificate" > Without this requirement, it seems the condition is untestable. It is, at least outside the bounds of a particular deployment. "All interop ends at ds:KeyInfo (tm)" -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]