saml-dev message

Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Minor inconsistency in SAML 2 spec?

From: "Josh Howlett" <J.Howlett@ukerna.ac.uk>
To: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>,<saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:29:00 +0100

> For the record, some people have complicated definitions of 
> it, mine was minimal, it's whoever tries to give an assertion 
> to a relying party in order to accomplish something. The Core 
> definition is worded passively in a tautological way, which 
> is not real helpful.

I understand; thanks for the clarification.

josh.