Re: [saml-dev] holder-of-key subject confirmation

["Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>]

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Rich.Levinson
<rich.levinson@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>  Anyone can read the cert, C1, and create a new cert, C2 with the same
>  subject name etc. But no one should trust C2, because C2 was not
>  contained in anything signed by IdP.

Rich, would you change your point of view if the relying party RP
happens to trust the certificate C2 presented by the user?

Tom