[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] multiple attributes
Yes, that's true. The recommendation should be to be conservative/safe in what you'll emit and robust in what you'll consume. Ari > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:58 AM > To: robert.philpott@rsa.com; nitindangwal@gmail.com > Cc: trscavo@gmail.com; saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [saml-dev] multiple attributes > > > > There may be implementations that process each attribute very > independently > > and the second occurrence may simply overwrite the first. > Using a single > > multi-valued attribute makes it quite clear that the > attribute has two > > values associated with it at the same time. > > I think the point of Tom's question is that in fact such > implementations are > broken and should be fixed. The spec doesn't allow that assumption. > > It's fine to say that the safe approach is to use multiple > values, but let's > not lose sight of the important part. > > -- Scott > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]