[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] SAML2HoKAP question
Tom Scavo wrote on 2009-05-19: > Add a <saml:NameID> element to the <saml:SubjectConfirmation> element, > you mean? This is useful in cases where the presenter is not the > attesting entity. The Shib-uPortal use case is one such example, I > think: > > https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/ShibuPortal/Home It is, though in retrospect the need to signal more strongly that delegation is happening led to my proposal for a condition rather than the very limited approach of an optional element without any mandatory processing rules. For situations where the possibility of delegation is just a given, using the confirmation might be ok. > Scott requested that this requirement be included in the profile, so > I'm sure he can provide more detail. If I said something, I don't recall it, but the basic definition there is just what's in core anyway, it's not unique to this profile. It's confirmation method agnostic. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]