[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [saml-dev] multiple SingleLogoutService elements with identical Binding
Hi Peter, On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Peter Schober <peter.schober@univie.ac.at> wrote: > > ... the IdP would never be able > to pick the "right" SingleLogoutService Location (given more than one > SingleLogoutService element with the same Binding and the "unindexed" > endpoint type) and would probably just pick the first one in SAML > metadata with a supported Binding (assuming the IdP consumed SAML > metadata for runtime behaviour). > > As such adding any additional SingleLogoutService elements would be > superfluous and would never achieve anything, right? FWIW, I've always considered such metadata to be bugged. There can be at most one non-indexed endpoint for each Binding value. Tom
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]