[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Quick question about AttributeValue
I have seen deployments where the mere existence of an Attribute with no values was used to indicate something about the Subject. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Cantor, Scott [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 3:13 PM > To: Nate Klingenstein; saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Quick question about AttributeValue > > On 6/4/14, 3:02 PM, "Nate Klingenstein" <ndk@internet2.edu> wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >It looks like the specification explicitly goes out of its way to > >permit attributes with zero values, e.g. an <AttributeValue/> element > >(core, 2.7.3.1/2.7.3.1.1). What was the rationale for this? > > That's not zero values, that's an empty value. And an xsi:nil is an > explicitly null value. Neither is the same as saying "no values", which > is just the absence of any elements. > > The rationale was simply that people wouldn't agree to restrict it. I > personally would have barred empty or null because there's no case I've > ever encountered where it does anything but create work for a > recipient. > > -- Scott > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]