[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Custom URIs within urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:
Hey, It seems the Italian government (or rather their "Agenzia per l'Italia digitale", AgID) has defined and mantates use of custom URIs within OASIS-owned namespaces, cf. the thread at: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/simplesamlphp/JKLvHKihEbs/o2qgQcLyAwAJ urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:SpidL1 urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:SpidL2 urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:SpidL3 Is that an issue to take up for the OASIS SSTC or for OASIS proper -- the assignment having been made in the "Technical Committee Work Products" namespace? While RFC 3121 also mentions the possibility of delegation: Assignment is limited to the owner and those authorities that are specifically designated by the owner. OASIS will assign portions of its namespace (specifically, those under the members hierarchy) for assignment by other parties. that reads like it would be limited to the members hierarchy (?) and I doubt the specific values above have been delegated. (Is there a public registry of delegated identifiers?) If you could provide a comment on that practice (or would prefer to have someone else within OASIS provide that comment) I'd send a reference to the archived reply to some Italian contacts (outside AgID). Not that I'd expect them to change their published technical documentation at this point... -peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]