[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sarif] Nested graphs: adopting Luke's proposal
Luke, Shouldn’t node.nestedGraphId:string be an array, node.nestedGraphIds:string[]? Can’t a node contain multiple child graphs? That’s how I’ll write the change draft unless I hear otherwise. Larry From: sarif@lists.oasis-open.org <sarif@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Larry Golding (Comcast) My sense of the TC’s discussion on nested graphs, combined with the attached thread, is that Luke’s “nested graphs” proposal has these advantages:
My “nested traversals” proposal has, AFAIK, only one advantage:
Based on this, I’m going to produce a change draft that removes nested traversals and implements Luke’s nested graphs proposal. Please speak up if you disagree. Larry |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]