OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-assembly-comment
19 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [sca-assembly-comment] Some more comments - relating to EventProcessing
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Jun 2009 15:03:23 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite fileis overly constraining
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 25 Jun 2009 07:49:58 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly-comment] Some more comments
From
"Jacques R. Durand" <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 24 Jun 2009 22:27:05 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2009 14:14:15 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite file is overly constraining
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2009 12:06:59 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Jun 2009 12:06:21 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite file isoverly constraining
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Jun 2009 10:36:01 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Jun 2009 10:27:05 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite file is overly constraining
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2009 10:09:54 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] Some more comments
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Jun 2009 08:01:36 -0000
.composite extension for composite file is overly constraining
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 24 Jun 2009 05:10:03 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] Comments on Public Review Draft 01
From
William Cox <wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com> on 24 Jun 2009 03:13:06 -0000
Comments on Public Review Draft 01
From
William Cox <wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com> on 24 Jun 2009 02:39:04 -0000
Some more comments
From
"Jacques R. Durand" <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 23 Jun 2009 21:48:46 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2009 17:06:47 -0000
Few comments from Siemens
From
"Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@siemens.com> on 11 Jun 2009 23:13:17 -0000
Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasonsfor requiring one of the existing 4 languages
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 10 Jun 2009 01:17:20 -0000
Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasonsfor requiring one of the existing 4 languages
From
Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2009 14:32:41 -0000
A few comments from Jacques Durand
From
"Jacques R. Durand" <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 6 Jun 2009 01:34:09 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2