sca-assembly-testing message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Assembly TestCases Complete and ready for Review
- From: Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>
- To: sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:16:55 -0400
I have now looked at all the test cases
(but not the various tables).
Testcase 12008: Misleading statement
(It is expected that the version that version actually imported will cause
the test to fail.) in comment in Test_ASM_12008.composite
Testcase 12009: Expected output is wrong.
It should be ASM_12009
request service1 operationx invoked Spurious
')' in comment in Test_ASM_12009.composite
Testcase 12010: ASM_120108/META-IF/sca-contribution.xml
should be ASM_12010/META-IF/sca-contribution.xml
Testcase 12011: Artifacts list has several
errors.
Second copy of Testcase 13002 after
Testcase 13008
Testcase 14001: Incomplete or extra.
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
05/13/2009 09:32 AM
|
To
| sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Assembly
TestCases Complete and ready for Review |
|
Through Section 10
Testcase 9002: Statically detectable error - needs a separate contribution.
Incorrect composite name and property value in Test_ASM_9002.
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
05/12/2009 01:38 PM
|
To
| sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Assembly
TestCases Complete and ready for Review |
|
More Comments (through Section 8)
Testcase 6004: Lists TestComposite16 in document but uses TestComposite18
Testcase 6016: Should be listed as a negative test.
Testcase 6020: Should be listed as a negative test.
Testcase 6033: Lists TestComposite44 in document but uses TestComposite41.
Testcase 7004: Duplicated
Testcase 8006: Lists TestComposite60 and TestComposite61 in document but
uses TestComposite54 and TestComposite55. Document indicates Service9 and
Service9Callback are used, which do not exist in SVN and are not referenced
by other artifacts.
Testcase 8015: Service1.wsdl should be listed.
Testcases with statically detectable errors that need separate contributions:
4002
4003
4004
4007
4008
5004
5005
5006
5007
5008
5009
5014
5023
5024
5027
5028
5029
5030
6001
6002
6003
6005
6006
6008
6012
6021
6022
6023
6025
6028
6029
6031
6032
6033
7001
7002
7003
7007
7008
7009
Testcases that need separate contributions if interface compatibility can
be checked statically:
5010
8006
8007
8008
8010
8011
Test cases that need separate contributions if introspections can be done
when a contribution is loaded:
8009
8012
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
05/12/2009 10:57 AM
|
To
| sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Assembly
TestCases Complete and ready for Review |
|
Bryan,
First, many thanks for reviewing the materials - the more eyes, the better.
I know there are "bugs" of various kinds in there - I keep
discovering them myself as I work on eliminating the
places where Tuscany does not yet conform to the OASIS specs.
1) Artifacts containing statically detectable errors
Yes, these will eventually need to be separated out into contributions
of their own.
My reason for not doing this so far is that Tuscany does not stop the testcases
running - it just prints warning
messages about the static errors that it finds. I am changing the
code in this area and this will force me to
hive off the "bad artifacts" into testcase-specific contributions.
2) Testcase 5031
You just reported your first bug against the testcases document ;-)
The document is wrong - it is a positive testcase with valid output. I've
changed the testcases doc.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>
|
To:
| sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 11/05/2009 18:58
|
Subject:
| Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Assembly
TestCases Complete and ready for Review |
I've started reviewing the test cases (I'm through Sections 4 & 5).
and I have a couple of questions.
ASM14002 states that a runtime SHOULD prevent deployment of a contribution
that contains statically detected errors. There are a number of test
cases that contain statically detectable errors, but are in the main contribution.
Examples include Text cases 4002-4004, and 5004-5006 (I have a full
list of the ones in sections 4 & 5 I believe are included in this category
if desired). Do these need to be restructured into separate contributions?
Why is test case 5031 a negative test? The description suggests it
should execute successfully.
I'm sure I will have more questions as I continue my review, but I wanted
to get these on the table.
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
05/08/2009 07:17 AM
|
To
| "OASIS Assembly"
<sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>, "OASIS Test " <sca-assembly-testing@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [sca-assembly-testing] Assembly TestCases
Complete and ready for Review |
|
Folks,
The TestCases for the SCA Assembly spec are now complete and are ready
for review.
You can find the TestCases document here:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly-testing/download.php/32453/SCA_Assembly_TestCases_21.odt
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly-testing/download.php/32455/SCA_Assembly_TestCases_21.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly-testing/download.php/32454/SCA_Assembly_TestCases_21.doc
and the Test Case artifacts are held in the OASIS SVN repository here:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/sca-assembly/TestCases/#_TestCases_
You can find the TestAssertions document here:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly-testing/download.php/31915/SCA_Assembly_Test_Assertions_16.odt
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly-testing/download.php/31914/SCA_Assembly_Test_Assertions_16.doc
A reminder of the schedule for review and approval of the TestAssertions
and the TestCases for the Assembly spec:
Schedule
TestAssertions document is already complete.
TestCases document (and Test Cases) complete May 1
Subcommittee Review May 1 - May 12
Subcommittee Vote - May 13
Assembly TC review May 1 - May 26
Assembly TC vote - May 26
We are a little late on the completion of the TestCases - if anyone thinks
that the overall schedule needs changing, please post to the list.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]