[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
> "CD-01-Rev3" sounds a reasonable name. Didn't we decide that there shouldn't be a dash between CD and the number. So, perhaps CD01-Rev3 All the best, Ashok Mike Edwards wrote: > > Anish, > > I can put your mind at rest - I am not asking for a CD vote. > > "CD-01-Rev3" sounds a reasonable name. > > Given that we have now resolved a load of issues, I think it is worth > thinking ahead to the > next CD - but I would expect all those resolved issues to get > incorporated first. I do want > to make sure that the incorporation of those issues is done based on > top of this conformance > version of the spec - just so that we don't have to go through this > exercise all over again! > > Yours, Mike. > > Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. > Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. > IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. > Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 > Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com > > > From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> > To: Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB > Cc: sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org > Date: 04/11/2008 07:31 > Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > 5. Conformance & Test > > > > Adopt the Conformance version of the specification as the next > working draft: > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/29791/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2%20Conformance-05.pdf > > > > > Did you mean this to be a working draft or CD or CD revision? After the > 1st CD we don't have any WDs. We have CD revisions and CDs. > I suspect you just want the TC to agree and informally accept what is in > this draft, perhaps make this a CD01-revX. > I know I'm being pedantic here, but I want to make sure that you are not > asking for a CD vote. > > Thanks. > > -Anish > -- > > mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com wrote: > > SCA Assembly Con Call has been modified by Dr. Mike Edwards > > > > Date: Tuesday, 04 November 2008 > > Time: 07:30am - 09:00am PT > > > > Event Description: > > Regular weekly TC teleconference > > > > Chat room: > > > > http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/sca-assembly-TC > > > > E-Meeting (may be useful for common viewing of documents) > > > > > https://www.mymeetings.com/emeet/join/index.jsp?customHeader=mymeetings&netId=SY83203&netPass=inglenook&netType=conference&acceptTerms=on& > <https://www.mymeetings.com/emeet/join/index.jsp?customHeader=mymeetings&netId=SY83203&netPass=inglenook&netType=conference&acceptTerms=on&> > > > > > Dial-in: > > > > <snip/> > > > > > PARTICIPANT PASSCODE: 338256 > > > > Agenda: > > 1. Opening > > > > Introductions > > Roll call > > Scribe confirmation > > Agenda bashing > > > > 2. Approval of minutes of SCA-Assembly TC meeting of 21st October > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/29899/SCA%20Assembly%20minutes%202008-10-28.html > > > > 3. Action Items: > > > > id=2008-06-03-6 status=pending Test sub cttee produce test > assertions and test artifacts and test harness > > id=2008-08-26-2 status=pending Editors to re-consider the > application of the resolution to assembly-57 > > id=2008-09-16-1 status=pending owner="Editors" Add text to justify > no operator overloading as described in DaveB's E-mail > > > > id=2008-10-30-1 status=pending Vorthmann to examine the > specification and create text that implements the directional > resolution to Assembly-37 > > id=2008-10-30-3 status=pending Karmaker to develop concrete text > consistent with the directional resolution to Assembly-36 > > id=2008-10-30-4 status=pending Editors to fix pseudoschemas a/r to > be consistent with the resolution that resolves Assembly-32 > > id=2008-10-30-5 status=pending Vorthman to create a proposal > relative to potential solution for issue 5 > > id=2008-10-30-6 status=pending Koenig do the detailed work to > implement the resolution to Assembly-60 > > id=2008-10-30-8 status=pending Freund to draft a conformance statement > > > > 4. TC Administrivia > > > > Reminder that next week's call on Nov 11th is cancelled > > > > 5. Conformance & Test > > > > Adopt the Conformance version of the specification as the next > working draft: > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/29791/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2%20Conformance-05.pdf > > > > 6. New Issues > > > > ASSEMBLY-88 Possible duplicate functionality offered by > constrainingType and component > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-88 > > > > ASSEMBLY-89 Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-89 > > > > Question for Debate concerning Component @name attribute > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200810/msg00058.html > > > > > > 7. Existing Issues > > > > ASSEMBLY-37 Need to clarify contents of an SCA Domain virtual composite > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-37 > > > > Direction agreed at Oct F2F - waiting writeup > > > > ASSEMBLY-33: Long-Running Request-Response Operations > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-33 > > > > ASSEMBLY-34: Define error handling > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-34 > > > > ASSEMBLY-46: Dynamic Aspects of the Domain not adequately described > in the Assembly Specification > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-46 > > > > ASSEMBLY-5: component type allows to specify wire targets on references > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-5 > > > > ASSEMBLY-86: Abstract CRUD APIs for definitions infoset > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-86 > > > > ASSEMBLY-87: A single definitions infoset is not sufficient > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-87 > > > > ASSEMBLY-80: Create an Event Processing Model for SCA > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-80 > > > > ASSEMBLY-2: use of UML 2.0 > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-2 > > > > > > 7. Issue Status > > 9 Open Issues > > x opened > > x resolved > > > > 8. AOB > > > > > > Minutes: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU/ > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]