OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-assembly message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 33] Updated Proposal for Issue 33



Mike,

My initial reaction to this is that it conflicts with the existing conversational support, although I see that there is a new issue to remove that support from the spec.  If that doesn't get accepted, are you comfortable with the spec including all of callbacks, conversations and async invocations?

The text says: "the binding must be able to treat the transmission of the request message separately from the transmission of the response message, with an arbitrarily large time interval between the two transmissions.".  Does that leave space for an implementation to include timeouts, or to hold correlation information non-persistently?  Even for HTTP some amount of asynchonous invocation is possible, at least from the point of view of the interacting components, although the connection would be lost if either party terminates or some comms error occurs.

I'd note that for the web services example given, the non-anonymous response URI allows a client of a service to act asynchronously, but it does not mean that the service itself will dispatch the request on its target component and handle the response asynchronously.

Regards, Simon

Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com



Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB

19/11/2008 10:51

To
"OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject
[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 33] Updated Proposal for Issue 33






Folks,


Here is an updated version of the proposal for Issue 33 following the discussion on the call yesterday:





This is the version that I am sending to the other TCs.


Note that the current Assembly specification does not define the requirements that bidirectional interfaces place on bindings, so the text in this proposal is the first place that this is defined for the Assembly specification.



Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php







Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






2008-11-12 - SCA-Assembly Issue 33 - Proposal_2.doc

2008-11-12 - SCA-Assembly Issue 33 - Java Mapping_2.doc



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]