OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-assembly
103 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
SVN now live
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 29 Jan 2009 05:19:37 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial cleanup of normative statetments
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 28 Jan 2009 23:04:27 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 28 Jan 2009 18:38:11 -0000
F2F meeting minutes - 2nd day
From
"Sabin Ielceanu" <sabin@tibco.com> on 28 Jan 2009 01:14:36 -0000
raw chat minutes for F2F from Jan 26 PM
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 27 Jan 2009 17:43:38 -0000
raw chat minutes for F2F from Jan 26 AM
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jan 2009 20:09:37 -0000
[ISSUE 2] use of UML 2.0
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 26 Jan 2009 18:38:10 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 26 Jan 2009 16:43:02 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 47] Interface element needs an operation childelement - Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Jan 2009 13:40:56 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 47] Interface element needs an operation childelement - Proposal
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jan 2009 13:21:57 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 91] Details needed for sca:ConversationViolation- PROPOSAL
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jan 2009 13:09:12 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 26 Jan 2009 12:53:24 -0000
[ISSUE 64] Specification inconsistent on whether a default value forProperty on a Constraining Type is allowed or not - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Jan 2009 12:42:53 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 25 Jan 2009 17:58:33 -0000
[ISSUE 47] Interface element needs an operation child element - Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Jan 2009 15:37:33 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 61] Component type information directlyin components - PROPOSAL
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 25 Jan 2009 14:59:59 -0000
[ISSUE 61] Component type information directly in components - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Jan 2009 14:13:12 -0000
[ISSUE 91] Details needed for sca:ConversationViolation - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Jan 2009 14:00:07 -0000
[Agenda Item] Removal of <operation/> Elements from the SCA Schema
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Jan 2009 10:42:22 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 37: Need to clarify contents of an SCA Domain virtual composite
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 23 Jan 2009 07:29:57 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Re: [sca-bindings] Question on application of BINDINGS-44resolution
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Jan 2009 14:44:29 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting added
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 22 Jan 2009 14:33:00 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call cancelled
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 22 Jan 2009 14:19:46 -0000
[ISSUE 105]: Add Support for Conversational Services in a future version
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Jan 2009 14:13:30 -0000
[ISSUE 104] Normative statement missing for <property/> @type and @elementattributes
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Jan 2009 14:08:28 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Question on application of BINDINGS-44 resolution
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Jan 2009 11:57:41 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Normative statement missing for <property/> @type and @elementattributes
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Jan 2009 14:34:28 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Add Support for Conversational Services in a futureversion
From
Michael Rowley <michael.rowley@activevos.com> on 21 Jan 2009 13:53:15 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 95: Proposed resolution
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Jan 2009 11:55:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Jan 2009 11:15:47 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Jan 2009 11:14:12 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2009-01-13.doc uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Jan 2009 11:12:28 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2009-01-13.pdf uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Jan 2009 11:11:34 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2009-01-13.pdf uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 21 Jan 2009 11:10:56 -0000
Draft Minutes 2009-01-20 with updated Roll are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 21 Jan 2009 10:59:27 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Draft Minutes from 2009-01-20 are attached
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 21 Jan 2009 08:55:33 -0000
Draft Minutes from 2009-01-20 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 20 Jan 2009 17:19:04 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 95: Proposed resolution
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jan 2009 15:24:37 -0000
ISSUE 95: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Jan 2009 14:53:56 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 34] Define error handling - Proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jan 2009 14:12:48 -0000
[sca-assembly-editors] [NEW ISSUE] SCA Specification is missing XSD for <definitions/> andConformance statements relating to <definitions/> and <contribution/>
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Jan 2009 13:16:21 -0000
[ISSUE 34] Define error handling - Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Jan 2009 11:23:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Jan 2009 10:23:19 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2009-01-13.doc uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Jan 2009 10:08:50 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Jan 2009 10:08:11 -0000
ISSUE 103: SCA Specification is missing XSD for <definitions/> and Conformance statements relating to <definitions/> and <contribution/>
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 20 Jan 2009 08:41:54 -0000
ISSUE 102: ASM60008 is a duplicate of ASM60012, ASM60013
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 20 Jan 2009 08:35:54 -0000
ISSUE 101: Complete the Conformance Section
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 20 Jan 2009 08:34:27 -0000
Assembly Spec schedule change
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Jan 2009 13:48:12 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] ASM60008 is a duplicate of ASM60012, ASM60013
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Jan 2009 12:21:32 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly CD02 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 15 Jan 2009 11:36:46 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly CD02 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 15 Jan 2009 11:34:16 -0000
SCA Assembly Specification Dependencies
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 15 Jan 2009 11:02:02 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [Fwd: f2f details and attendance question]
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 14 Jan 2009 13:45:30 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Defintion of Composite ReferenceMultiplicity contains conflicting information
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jan 2009 13:43:17 -0000
[Fwd: f2f details and attendance question]
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 14 Jan 2009 13:36:04 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2008-09-09.html modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jan 2009 10:49:48 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly CD02 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02.doc) modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jan 2009 10:49:10 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly CD02 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf) modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jan 2009 10:48:26 -0000
[ISSUE 98] Conformance Assertion [ASM50012] is invalid - updated proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 14 Jan 2009 10:42:46 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly CD02 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jan 2009 10:34:48 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly CD02 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jan 2009 08:53:54 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Complete the Conformance Section
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 13 Jan 2009 17:59:37 -0000
raw minutes Jan 13 2009
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Jan 2009 17:08:26 -0000
ISSUE 100: Defintion of Composite Reference Multiplicity contains conflicting information
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 13 Jan 2009 15:47:20 -0000
Groups - CD-01 Rev8 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev8_a.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jan 2009 15:20:15 -0000
Groups - CD-01 Rev8 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev8_a.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jan 2009 15:17:03 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Defintion of Composite Reference Multiplicity containsconflicting information
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Jan 2009 14:38:56 -0000
ISSUE 99: Missing Conformance point for callbackInterface on interface.wsdl
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Jan 2009 14:01:04 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jan 2009 13:59:09 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jan 2009 13:28:48 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jan 2009 13:27:27 -0000
Re: [sca-j] F2F - can we start after the SCA-J call?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Jan 2009 12:53:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] F2F - can we start after the SCA-J call?
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 12 Jan 2009 23:02:11 -0000
F2F - can we start after the SCA-J call?
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jan 2009 20:38:03 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Conversational services
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Jan 2009 12:20:09 -0000
Draft Minutes from 2008-01-06 are attached (previous email was wrong version, sorry)
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 10 Jan 2009 13:15:07 -0000
Draft Minutes from 2009-01-16 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 10 Jan 2009 13:13:08 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Conversational services
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 10 Jan 2009 01:52:05 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 94: Conversational services
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 10 Jan 2009 00:52:25 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Conversational services
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 10 Jan 2009 00:32:02 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Missing Conformance point for callbackInterface on interface.wsdl
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jan 2009 16:41:03 -0000
Letter to OpenCSA TCs on conformance and dependancies
From
Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> on 8 Jan 2009 21:09:17 -0000
Letter to OpenCSA TCs on conformance and dependancies
From
Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> on 8 Jan 2009 21:06:44 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - CD-01 Rev8 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev8.doc) uploaded
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 7 Jan 2009 20:10:04 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 90] Clarify @promote in the context of compositeincludes - New Proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 7 Jan 2009 16:38:01 -0000
[ISSUE 90] Clarify @promote in the context of composite includes - NewProposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 7 Jan 2009 14:10:16 -0000
f2f details and attendance question
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 6 Jan 2009 17:35:56 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Conversational services
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 6 Jan 2009 17:05:41 -0000
ISSUE 98: Conformance Assertion [ASM50012] is invalid
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:56:21 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Conformance Assertion [ASM50012] isinvalid
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:52:39 -0000
[sca-assembly] Incorporating resolutions for Issues 74, 53 and 60, 32 (Schemafiles...) - CORRECTIONS
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:12:34 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Conversational services
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:08:36 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 94: Conversational services
From
"Meeraj Kunnumpurath" <mkunnumpurath@googlemail.com> on 5 Jan 2009 22:08:36 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Conversational services
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Jan 2009 21:39:23 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 94: Conversational services
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Jan 2009 20:43:45 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2008-12-16.html uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 5 Jan 2009 11:49:40 -0000
Groups - SCA-Assembly XML Schema Files (SCA-Assembly XML Schemas_Jan2008.zip) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 5 Jan 2009 11:48:47 -0000
Groups - CD-01 Rev8 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev8.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 5 Jan 2009 11:47:13 -0000
Groups - CD-01 Rev8 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev8.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 5 Jan 2009 11:05:08 -0000
Updated XSD Files to match CD01-Rev8 specification
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Jan 2009 14:46:41 -0000
[sca-assembly] Latest SCA Assembly Spec revision - all Resolved Issuesapplied
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Jan 2009 14:45:54 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Conformance Assertion [ASM50012] is invalid
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Jan 2009 11:04:42 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2