sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] CD02 Rev6 available - and Do we need an additionalAssembly TC call on Monday 2nd?
- From: David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
- To: sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:30:26 -0500
I think we need the extra call to be safe.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Mike Edwards ---02/25/2009 08:07:53 AM---Folks, CD02 Rev6 is available on the OASIS site:
From: |
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> |
To: |
"OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org> |
Date: |
02/25/2009 08:07 AM |
Subject: |
[sca-assembly] CD02 Rev6 available - and Do we need an additional Assembly TC call on Monday 2nd? |
Folks,
CD02 Rev6 is available on the OASIS site:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31411/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev6.pdf
This revision contains the updates for ALL of the Resolved issues, plus editorial updates resulting from reviews by Vamsi, myself
and other comments.
This leaves us with 5 remaining open issues to deal with before being in a position to vote a CD03 and a Public Review draft of the
spec:
109 - updated proposal exists following previous discussions - we should be able to vote to resolve this issue
102 - there is a proposal to close with no action
101 - there is a proposal - we should be able to vote to resolve this issue
87 - there is a proposal to close with no action
80 - there is no proposal currently and we can defer this
The question is: can we dispose of all 5 issues AND vote on a CD03 and a Public Review draft at next Tuesday's regular call, or do
we need to consider an additional call on Monday 2nd, using the slot normally used by the Policy TC?
I can prepare a CD03 draft based on the current proposals and expected outcome of the 5 issues as listed above - the problem will
be if we decide to change the proposals and/or the outcome of the issues above. If we basically accept the current proposals, then
I think that the 90 minutes on Tuesday will be enough, but this is a presumption on my part.
What are your views? Do we need the extra meeting on Monday?
Please email the list with your views.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]