OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-assembly
74 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Sanjay's Proposal - Discussion
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 29 Oct 2009 15:57:14 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Sanjay's Proposal - Discussion
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Oct 2009 10:40:21 -0000
[ASSEMBLY 187] Unmarked MUST in section 10.8 - PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Oct 2009 09:48:04 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Sanjay's Proposal - Discussion
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Oct 2009 09:33:50 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Unmarked MUST in section 10.8
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Oct 2009 09:24:24 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Sanjay's Proposal - Discussion
From
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> on 28 Oct 2009 21:01:26 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Unmarked MUST in section 10.8
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 28 Oct 2009 20:28:37 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Sanjay's Proposal - Discussion
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 28 Oct 2009 18:12:58 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Sanjay's Proposal - Discussion
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Oct 2009 14:23:05 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 28 Oct 2009 13:04:57 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 28 Oct 2009 13:04:05 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 183 - discussion and proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 28 Oct 2009 11:37:16 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 183 - discussion and proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Oct 2009 10:47:11 -0000
Issue 183
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 27 Oct 2009 23:01:47 -0000
Draft minutes from 2009-10-27 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 27 Oct 2009 16:08:39 -0000
[ISSUE 143] There are no conformance statements in section 8.5 (CD03) -Updated Proposal 2
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Oct 2009 15:07:21 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Oct 2009 14:05:42 -0000
[ISSUE 143] There are no conformance statements in section 8.5 (CD03) -Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Oct 2009 13:51:59 -0000
[ISSUE 143] There are no conformance statements in section 8.5 (CD03) -Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Oct 2009 13:38:55 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Oct 2009 13:24:08 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Oct 2009 13:23:06 -0000
Draft minutes from 2009-10-20/21 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 27 Oct 2009 12:04:23 -0000
Reminder: SCA Assembly TC call today
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Oct 2009 12:03:02 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Oct 2009 11:58:07 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 132: Proposal
From
"Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@siemens.com> on 21 Oct 2009 22:30:53 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] SCA Events f2f
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 21 Oct 2009 07:02:51 -0000
Issue 132: Proposal
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 20 Oct 2009 23:54:34 -0000
Groups - Wednesday Session of SCA Assembly TC Call modified
From
martin.chapman@oracle.com on 20 Oct 2009 16:41:23 -0000
[sca-assembly] Various issues in assembly test cases
From
Simon Laws <simon_laws@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Oct 2009 14:22:28 -0000
[sca-assembly] A couple more issues in assembly test cases
From
Simon Laws <simon_laws@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Oct 2009 14:22:23 -0000
[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 138] Assembly specification unclear on Contributionvs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? - UpdatedProposal 2
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Oct 2009 14:20:22 -0000
[ISSUE 143] There are no conformance statements in section 8.5 (CD03) -Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Oct 2009 14:11:35 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Oct 2009 06:52:54 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Oct 2009 06:43:38 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Oct 2009 06:42:59 -0000
Draft minutes of 2009-10-13 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 19 Oct 2009 21:22:26 -0000
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 19 Oct 2009 12:54:13 -0000
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 19 Oct 2009 12:52:27 -0000
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 19 Oct 2009 12:50:33 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status - and a Directional Proposal
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 15 Oct 2009 13:15:34 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status - and a Directional Proposal
From
"Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@siemens.com> on 15 Oct 2009 11:45:59 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status - and a DirectionalProposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 14 Oct 2009 15:31:56 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status - and a Directional Proposal
From
"Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@siemens.com> on 14 Oct 2009 14:49:31 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Oct 2009 16:04:30 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status - and a DirectionalProposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Oct 2009 15:00:41 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Oct 2009 13:47:59 -0000
[ISSUE 138] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment -when can errors in artifacts be reported? - Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Oct 2009 13:13:31 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Oct 2009 12:47:25 -0000
Updated SCA Assembly specification - CD03 Rev4
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Oct 2009 12:44:18 -0000
Groups - CD03-Rev4 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev4.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Oct 2009 12:40:55 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Draft minutes from 2009-10-06 and 07
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 13 Oct 2009 10:21:10 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Draft minutes from 2009-10-06 and 07
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Oct 2009 10:11:13 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Oct 2009 10:08:26 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Oct 2009 09:44:48 -0000
Draft minutes from 2009-10-06 and 07 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 12 Oct 2009 20:48:14 -0000
[sca-assembly] Use of XPath for locating properties
From
Simon Laws <simon_laws@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Oct 2009 10:18:29 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Binding name in the service/reference promotion case
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Oct 2009 12:57:16 -0000
SCA Events f2f
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 7 Oct 2009 18:51:03 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - Wednesday Session of SCA Assembly TC Call modified
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 7 Oct 2009 16:00:56 -0000
Groups - Wednesday Session of SCA Assembly TC Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 7 Oct 2009 14:15:09 -0000
Version Control Commit by booz
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 7 Oct 2009 11:42:15 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 6 Oct 2009 13:44:20 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: ASM_5023 - incorrect interfaces andreference name in TestComposite11.composite
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Oct 2009 13:41:04 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 6 Oct 2009 13:30:21 -0000
[sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: ASM_5023 - incorrect interfaces and referencename in TestComposite11.composite
From
Simon Laws <simon_laws@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Oct 2009 11:22:06 -0000
Issue 157: alternate proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 6 Oct 2009 07:00:21 -0000
[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 152] Let's discuss
From
"Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@siemens.com> on 5 Oct 2009 16:29:29 -0000
[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status?
From
"Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@siemens.com> on 5 Oct 2009 16:09:35 -0000
Draft minutes from 2009-09-29 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 5 Oct 2009 15:19:18 -0000
NZ trip blog
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 3 Oct 2009 06:32:24 -0000
Version Control Commit by booz
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 2 Oct 2009 20:56:02 -0000
Version Control Commit by booz
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 2 Oct 2009 20:54:42 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Binding name in the service/reference promotioncase
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 1 Oct 2009 16:25:36 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Binding name in the service/reference promotion case
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 1 Oct 2009 12:29:08 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2