sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [sca-c-cpp-comment] Microsoft public review comments on SCA C/C++ implementationmodel specifications
- From: Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>
- To: sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org, oasis Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:18:50 -0500
This is from the current C and C++ public
review. Points 2 and 3 refer to items the Assembly and Policy TC
need to investigate.
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Bryan
Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM on 03/02/2010 08:16 AM -----
From:
| Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
|
To:
| "sca-c-cpp-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<sca-c-cpp-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 03/01/2010 11:32 PM
|
Subject:
| [sca-c-cpp-comment] Microsoft public
review comments on SCA C/C++ implementation model specifications |
This is Microsoft’s public comment about
the following two specifications under public review per announcement [1]:
- Service
Component Architecture Client and Implementation Model for C++ Specification
Version 1.1
- Service
Component Architecture Client and Implementation Model for C Specification
Version 1.1
We have been attempting to review the above
specifications, but have been unable to complete our review due the following
problems with the specifications as published:
1) The revised C and C++ specifications
http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-c-cpp/sca-ccni-1.1-spec-cd04.pdf
and http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-c-cpp/sca-cppcni-1.1-spec-cd04.html
include markup to indicate changes but we could not find where the clean
versions are provided. There is enough markup in these documents to make
the document impossible to review in places.
2) The RDDL document for http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912
refers to at least two XML Schema documents that are not valid. For
example the first XML schema listed (http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-1.1-cd05.xsd)
apparently contains invalid whitespace, and the 5th item (http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-policy-1.1-intents-definitions-cd03.xsd)returns
“HTTP 404 Not Found” error.
3) The RDDL document for http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912
refers to at least one XML Schema document that returns a 404. For example
the 5th XML Schema listed (http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-policy-1.1-intents-definitions-cd03.xsd)
is not retrievable (404 error).
4) But the biggest obstacle in our reviewing
of the specifications is the fact that the required C/C++ header files
are missing from the specifications. Without being able to review the C/C++
header files, it is impossible to perform a complete and meaningful review
of the specifications.
Sincerely,
Michael Champion,
Microsoft Corporation
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201002/msg00005.html
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]