OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-assembly message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Concrete Exit Criteria for the SCA Assembly TC - Proposal



On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Jim Marino wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> I guess I may now be even more confused, probably because of my  
> ignorance of OASIS rules. Why would the exit criteria for the TC  
> require an implementation to adhere to something that is not  
> normative, specifically running and passing the TC-supplied test  
> suite? Also, who determines whether a runtime passes or not?

I am having a hard time pinning down your confusion.

There is a test suite that has been developed by the TC. When you take  
your implementation and run it through the test suite, you get an  
"answer". That's the answer you are looking for.

The exit criteria require that there be 2 independent impls that run  
the test suite, and get answer that says "yes" (or all green ;-).
    jeff
>
> Jim
>
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Martin Chapman wrote:
>
>> Jim,
>>
>> I think you are confusing the normative-ness of the test suite with  
>> TC exit criteria.
>> You are correct that to claim conformance you don’t have to pass  
>> the TC’s test suite, but that is different from the TC saying that  
>> in order to progress the spec to Committee Specification/OASIS  
>> Standard we want two implementations passing the TC’s test suite.
>>
>> Martin.
>>
>> From: Jim Marino [mailto:jim.marino@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 22 February 2011 20:08
>> To: OASIS Assembly
>> Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Concrete Exit Criteria for t! he SCA  
>> Assembly TC - Proposal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The first bullet makes sense to me. Concerning the second, my  
>> understanding is the TC Test Suite is not normative and the only  
>> thing required for conformance is for the entity responsible for a  
>> particular runtime to declare that it adheres to the normative  
>> portions of the Assembly Specification. In other words, it should  
>> be valid for a runtime to claim conformance that supplies its own  
>> test suite, which may or may not be based on the TC one. This  
>> essentially goes back to using the "court of public opinion" to  
>> judge conformance claims as opposed to something akin to a TCK.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I propose the following as the Exit Criteria to be adopted by the  
>> SCA Assembly TC:
>>
>> "The Concrete Exit Criteria for the SCA Assembly V1.1 specification  
>> are that:
>>
>> o there shall be 2 independent SCA runtimes that are compliant with  
>> all normative portions of the
>> specification as described in! Section 12.2 of the SCA Assembly  
>> V1.1 specification
>>
>> o the 2 independent runtimes shall pass the Test Suite for SCA  
>> Assembly as described in the document
>> 'TestCases for the SCA Assembly Model Version 1.1 Specification' "
>>
>>
>> I believe that this is sufficient to cover:
>> - the question of conformance to the spec
>> - the issues of portability and interoperability
>>
>> since the test suite is a pretty thorough examination of  
>> conformance to the spec (there are testcases for
>> all normative statements with testable & observable consequences)  
>> and the test suite is also a test of portability,
>> since the test suite has an extensive set of artifacts that are  
>> ported to each runtime and interoperability is
>> checked through the use of Web services being used between the SCA  
>> runtime and a non-SCA (JAXWS) client.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yours, Mike
>> Dr Mike Edwards
>>  Mail Point 146, Hursley Park
>> <Mail Attachment.gif>
>> STSM
>>  Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN
>> SCA & Services Standards
>>  United Kingdom
>> Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC
>>
>> IBM Software Group
>>
>> Phone:
>> +44-1962 818014
>>
>> Mobile:
>> +44-7802-467431 (274097)
>>
>> e-mail:
>> mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Unless stat! ed otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
>> number 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
>> PO6 3AU
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Jeff Mischkinsky			          		jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Sr. Director, Oracle Fusion Middleware 				+1(650)506-1975
	and Web Services Standards           			500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 2OP9
Oracle								Redwood Shores, CA 94065











[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]