FW: [sca-assembly] Version 1.2 WD06

["Eric Wells" <eric.wells@hitachisoftware.com>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:05 PM
To: eric.wells@hitachisoftware.com
Cc: 'Mike Edwards'
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Version 1.2 WD06

248 was raised as a catch all issue for 2119 keywords related to 
eventing. When it was raised, we were debating several critical issues 
wrt the model and did not want to be bogged down by various 
MUST/SHOULD/MAYs and decided that we'll file a separate issue to deal 
with that. Subsequently, several issue resolution proposals have 
included 2119 keywords. I'm not confident that this issue is completely 
resolved. It'll probably take one of the editors to take a closer look 
and identify fixes before we can resolve this.

As you may have seen in my other email. It is really 245 that is 
resolved with v1.2CSD01 and not 246.

-Anish
--

On 7/28/2011 11:41 PM, Eric Wells wrote:
> Anish&  Mike,
>                I also think SCA Assembly v1.2 CSD01 may resolve
ASSEMBLY-248.
>
> There seems to be several similar issues all related to WS-Event
> Descriptions:
>
> 	http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-245
> 	http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-246
> 	http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-248
>
> It seems that CSD01 resolves all of these.
>
> However, although there are RFC2119 keywords in some of the eventing
> material not all of these are labeled as normative statements. E.g. line
> 4204 of the WORD doc reads:
>
> 	Each QName in the list MUST be associated with a Namespace URI.
>
> But the statement does not appear to be labeled normative. There are also
a
> few other examples.
>
> Would it be better to leave ASSEMBLY-248 unresolved or open a new issue to
> add the normative labeling?
>
> Best Regards,
>                Eric.
>
> Eric Wells
> Consulting Engineer
> Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
> Cell: +1 415 672 2594
> eric.wells@hitachisoftware.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Wells [mailto:eric.wells@hitachisoftware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:25 PM
> To: 'Anish Karmarkar'
> Cc: 'Mike Edwards'
> Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] Version 1.2 WD06
>
> Anish,
>         Did we not adopt this as SCA Assembly v1.2 CSD01 on 2011-07-19?
>
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/42938
> /SCA%20Assembly%20minutes%202011-07-19.html#d1e144
>
> If so should this have also resolved ASSEMBLY-245 as well as ASSEMBLY-246?
> (Or is it that it was only 245 that was resolved, which looks more likely)
>
> Best Regards,
>                 Eric.
>
> Eric Wells
> Consulting Engineer
> Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
> Cell: +1 415 672 2594
> eric.wells@hitachisoftware.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:50 PM
> To: OASIS Assembly
> Subject: [sca-assembly] Version 1.2 WD06
>
> I have created v1.2 WD06 to include resolution of issue 245 (use of
> WSRA's WS-EventDescriptions) plus some minor ed fixes:
>
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42767/sca-assembly-1.2-spe
> c-wd06.zip
>
> The diff file in the zip contains diffs between WD05 and WD06.
>
> Please let me know if you have any comments.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>