OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-assembly message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Fwd: Suggested text for Assembly 233


Hi Ashok!

Comments inline.

Jim

On Sep 29, 2011, at 10:28 PM, ashok malhotra wrote:

> Hi Jim:
> Good to hear from you!  Let me clarify.
> First, that was a personal assessment not an Oracle position.
> Second, that is how I feel today Sept, 29, 2011.
> New evidence can obviously cause that position to change.
> 
> We are trying to get OASIS to start a public review for SCA Policy 1.1.
> If we find bugs we will fix, 1.1, not start 1.2.
> 
> If the TCs decide that we need to work on Policy for eventing then, indeed,
> we will need SCA Policy 1.2 but that is for the TCs to decide.  I'm guessing that
> the chances of that happening are low but then, what do I know?
> 
That sounds reasonable. From the original wording, it seemed that a decision had already been made not to make any changes but I now understand better the intent (no pun intended).

> BTW:  Have you done any Policy Testing for Fabric3?  Please let us know.

We have our own tests but as far as the test suite, nothing "official" yet. As an unscientific guess (i.e. without doing exhaustive testing and cross referencing the normative spec statements), I would expect Fabric3 to be conformant. If/when I have more info ready to be made public, I'll let you know.

Jim


> All the best, Ashok
> 
> On 9/29/2011 10:38 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
>> On Sep 28, 2011, at 5:07 PM, ashok malhotra wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Eric:
>>> There is not going to be a SCA Policy 1.2 and we need to say something about Policy
>>> on events.
>> 
>> Hi Ashok,
>> 
>> Could you elaborate on what you mean by "there is not going to be a SCA Policy 1.2"? What if issues with Policy 1.1 are discovered in practical use? Also, what if we come to the conclusion that the eventing changes in Assembly require clarifications and potentially modification to the existing Policy model?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jim
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: sca-assembly-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: sca-assembly-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: sca-assembly-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: sca-assembly-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]