RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 3 - portType referred to inconsistently throughout specification

["Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com>]

Eric,

I hate to be a pill, but we are going to have a ton of email that will
all start with the same boilerplate.

Could we go with:

RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 3 - portType referred to...

as the format rather than:

RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE: BINDINGS-3 - portType referred to...

Saying "bindings" twice at the beginning of the subject just pushes the
actual subject title way off to the right.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Johnson [mailto:eric@tibco.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 6:00 PM
To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE: BINDINGS-3 - portType referred to
inconsistently throughout specification

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-3

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Title: portType referred to inconsistently throughout the
specification
>
> Target: Web Services Binding, draft 20070926
>
> Description:  The WSDL 1.1 notion of "portType" is referred to
> inconsistently throughout the document.  Sometimes it is referred to
as
> "PortType".
>
> Proposal: Change "PortType" to "portType" except where being used as
> part of a section heading that naturally capitalizes words.
> References to "PortType" found throughout section 2.
>
>
>
>