Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-31: What is a "plain name" for a connectionfactories or activation specs, and how is one distinguished from a JNDI name?

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Logged as http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-31

-Eric.

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Target: JMS Binding specification
>
> Description:
> In the definition of the binding.jms/activationSpec, 
> binding.jms/response/activationSpec, binding.jms/connectionFactory, 
> and binding.jms/response/connectionFactory elements, the spec 
> introduces the notion of a "plain name".  This notion of plain name is 
> not defined anywhere, and either needs a reference, or needs to be 
> defined in this specification.
>
> Further, it is not clear that it is possible, in the general case, to 
> distinguish a JNDI name from a "plain" name.
>
> Proposal:
> Either remove the reference to "plain" names, or provide the context 
> to make these meaningful and clearly distinct from JNDI names.
>
> If "plain" names are really a notion of vendor extension, we should 
> formalize how these extensions happen.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php