[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Attempt #4 at WSDL binding
Hi Anish, Anish Karmarkar wrote: [snip - At the risk of having removed too much context from the discussion.] > The bigger question, is do we want our default binding to be > interoperable, if yes, then we should stick to BP conformance with > some minimal exceptions. Anything else, define your own WSDL binding. > >> If you think this really is an error, is seems that the assembly >> specification must state something normative about how interface.wsdl >> portTypes cannot be any odd WSDL 1.1 portType, but they must be WS-I >> BP 1.2 compliant portTypes. But I don't think it should. > I don't think we need to go that far. If someone wants to do BP > non-compliant portType they can, but they have to define their own > bindings. Don't rely on defaults. That sounds like a decent approach. I'll have to think about it more prior to our next meeting, but it seems like a reasonable constraint - if the portType is not compatible with BP 1.2, then the user must explicitly provide their own binding. -Eric.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]