Re: [sca-bindings] Re: QNames vs. NCNames

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Hi Mike,

Mike Edwards wrote:

OF8761B854.02F3450C-ON80257515.003F3869-80257515.0045D6E0@uk.ibm.com" type="cite">
Folks,

Comments inline as <mje>...</mje>

Random note - in assembly CD01-rev3, the following appear to be in error:

• line 2036, 2040, 2054, 2058 - @name attribute on the binding element is xs:NCName, not xs:QName

<mje> I don't think that this is an error.  The @name attribute defines the LOCAL part of a QName - and such local parts are always declared as NCName
with the namespace deriving from the @targetNamespace of the enclosing document.
The only reason to have an attribute that is declared as a QName is where the attribute is referring to some XML entity declared elsewhere - in that case
the full QName is needed.
</mje>

I am pretty certain that it is an error, because any "binding" element or type that I could find in the schema portion of the document always shows this @name attribute as an NCName.  Those lines above show the @name attribute as a QName.

-Eric.