sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Re: [sca-bindings] Question on application of BINDINGS-44resolution
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:44:08 +0000
Mike, when we resolve the naming convention
issue for the JMS binding and know what these elements should be called
I'll raise this with assembly.
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB
22/01/2009 11:57
|
To
| sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
| "OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| [sca-assembly] Re: [sca-bindings] Question
on application of BINDINGS-44 resolution |
|
Simon,
I'm happy to get the Assembly spec changed as an editorial update to use
a valid name for wireFormat and operationSelector examples.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
|
To:
| sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 21/01/2009 14:05
|
Subject:
| [sca-bindings] Question on application
of BINDINGS-44 resolution |
Folks,
I have a question on the resolution of issue BINDINGS-44 (Update binding.jms
spec for wireFormat/operationSelection elements)
The resolution text includes introduction of new elements:
<wireFormat.jmsdefault>
<operationSelector.jmsdefault>
However these are only mentioned in the text, there is no schema definition
for these.
Should there be an update to the schema to define these two elements? If
so I'd imagine the following needs adding to the binding.jms schema:
<element name="wireFormat.jmsdefault" type="sca:WireFormatType"
substitutionGroup="sca:wireFormat"/>
<element name="operationSelector.jmsdefault" type="sca:OperationSelectorType"
substitutionGroup="sca:operationSelector"/>
Also as per the naming conventions issue I suspect that these ought to
be called:
<wireFormat.jmsDefault>
<operationSelector.jmsDefault>
A side note: the current Assembly CD draft refers to the default JMS wire
format as <sca:wireFormat.jms>
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]